MEDICAL AUTHORING COMPANION · CUSTOMER STORY
A European dermatology company
Bringing dermatology evidence together for CSR authoring.
An anonymized case study on structuring clinical trial information to support clear, consistent Clinical Study Reports in dermatology.
Company European dermatology companyWork Dermatology CSRsSolution Medical Authoring Companion
WORKFLOW FOCUSClinical detail organized
Clinical detail organized
for clearer reporting.
A structured authoring process helps bring dermatology study findings, source context, and report review into closer alignment.
organized
context
and terminology
final approval
THE PROBLEM
Complex study findings. A detailed reporting task.
Clinical studies in dermatology can bring together detailed efficacy and safety findings, study procedures, and patient-level information that must be presented clearly in a Clinical Study Report.
This anonymized European dermatology company wanted a more structured way to transform clinical source material into CSR drafts while keeping relevant study context connected to the narrative.
When report sections are prepared across multiple sources and contributors, maintaining consistent terminology and aligning findings throughout the document can require significant coordination and review.
THE SOLUTION
Structure the evidence. Support expert-led drafting.
Narrativa’s Medical Authoring Companion helps organize clinical inputs into the structure of a CSR, supporting draft preparation while medical writers and clinical experts retain control of interpretation and approval.
Organize clinical inputs
Bring study data and source material into a connected authoring workflow.
Draft structured sections
Prepare CSR content with terminology and document structure in view.
Review clinical meaning
Keep qualified medical writers responsible for scientific context and final approval.
THE KPIS
Ways to assess report quality and flow.
Drafting cycle time
Track the time required to move from approved study inputs to initial CSR sections.
Evidence alignment
Review how clearly report statements connect to relevant study sources.
Cross-section consistency
Assess consistent use of terminology and findings across the report.
Review cycles
Monitor review comments, revisions, and time spent preparing final CSR content.
THE OUTCOME
A structured foundation for clinical review.
The workflow is designed to help the team prepare organized CSR drafts with study context and source material close at hand. Writers and clinical experts remain responsible for confirming findings, refining the report, and approving its final content.